By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker addresses the issue of financial transparency concerning the Prime Minister’s undeclared funds (over 350,000 euros) and the matter of doing business with Russia. A broader economic philosophy regarding taxes, spending, or regulations is not presented.

Economic views are vehemently opposed to the massive state subsidies and revenue guarantees provided to foreign investors for speculative energy projects. The speaker views this as squandering taxpayer money and prefers that state resources be directed toward social needs. Criticism is leveled against the speculative world that demands gigantic sums from the state.

Economic positions support increasing national defense personnel expenses, specifically advocating for compensating reservists for lost wages. This underscores the necessity of fair compensation for labor, even if it translates to higher expenditures for the state budget. The Ministry of Defense is criticized for its stinginess.

The attitude towards austerity is critical, especially when it comes at the expense of rural areas and leads to the decline of community life. [The policy/speaker] supports maintaining state investments and retaining specialists in regional centers (e.g., Vana-Vigala) to prevent residents from leaving.

Insufficient data.

Economic views are strongly pro-market and anti-subsidy, especially in the energy sector, where 2.6 billion euros in support payments are being criticized. The speaker accuses the government of driving the economy into the ground and destroying competitiveness. They oppose senseless bureaucracy, such as sustainability reports, which place a heavy burden on businesses.