Session Profile: Anti Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-04-14
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to the government-subsidized green transition and the development of wind farms, viewing it as a utopian continuation of the Soviet-era planning committee. The speaker emphasizes fiscal responsibility and sharply criticizes the loss of 2.8 billion euros from the public purse, calling into question the economic logic of the entire project. The stance is highly confrontational and focuses on highlighting the inefficiency of government operations and the risk of corruption.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the field of energy planning (gigawatt, terawatt-hour) and financial analysis, highlighting specific figures regarding the over-dimensioning of wind farms. He is particularly detailed in his criticism of the financial results of suspicious shelf companies (OÜ Kirsimäe, OÜ Gottlieb) and their potential receipt of subsidies, using sales revenue data (e.g., 1655 euros) to call their trustworthiness into question.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, passionate, and accusatory, employing strong historical parallels (the Soviet Planning Committee in 1980, NRG Energy in 1999) to discredit the government. The speaker uses emotional phrases ("traveling circus," "magician's trick," "pyramid scheme") and irony to emphasize the illogical nature of the policy and the loss of public funds. The tone is predominantly critical and ominous, suggesting the imminent collapse of the policy.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the plenary session by asking questions and referencing meetings with people living in wind farm areas, expressing the communities' concerns. They have also been researching companies' annual reports to find evidence of subsidy misuse.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponent is the government and its ministers (Sikkut and Keldo are referenced), who are being accused of restoring a planned economy and ignoring the concerns of the populace. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of arrogance, relying on shell companies, and a one-sided interpretation of democracy ("We're pushing you down the pipe"). The speaker also references the US withdrawal from the climate agreement to undermine the global legitimacy of the green transition.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national energy policy, but regional impacts are highlighted, specifically referencing Saare Wind and the wind turbine currently standing idle in Ida-Virumaa. Particular emphasis is placed on the risk that local municipalities could face bankruptcy due to the costs associated with decommissioning the wind turbines—a clear indication of concern regarding local administrative capacity.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic views expressed are strongly opposed to subsidies and state intervention, characterizing the green transition as an unsustainable subsidy scheme that merely churns taxpayer money. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of preventing the emergence of the most expensive electricity in Europe, coupled with a warning against channeling funds to shell companies. This stance clearly indicates a strong preference for a market economy and strict fiscal discipline.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, attention is focused on the concerns of communities and citizens concerning the construction of wind farms, defending their right to raise questions and opposing government threats to restrict those rights. The speaker supports the popular initiative and the expression of community concern, citing the 1999 signature collection by the People's Union (Rahvaliit) as a positive precedent.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on opposing the government's energy policy and subsidy schemes, rather than initiating new draft legislation. The speaker promises that a future EKRE government will abolish the subsidies, which signals an intent to amend current legislation and a desire to dismantle the existing regulatory framework.
5 Speeches Analyzed