Session Profile: Anti Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
2025-03-13
Political Position
This political stance heavily focuses on investigating the actions of state authorities during the vaccination period, demanding a comprehensive explanation regarding the insufficient investigation and alleged misclassification of adverse effects (such as myocarditis). The position is sharply critical of the state's conduct and underscores the necessity of probing conflicts of interest among those who recommended the vaccines. The overall framework is primarily directed at ensuring the performance and accountability of state institutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding vaccine side effects (myocarditis, sudden death) and vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, mRNA), referencing the specific death of a 23-year-old rescuer. He/She is also familiar with institutional structures, such as the Health Board (Terviseamet), the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) support group for investigating side effects, and the activities of the US Department of Health.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and demanding, focusing on questioning the actions of state institutions and stressing the need for investigation. Formal language is employed, but it is interspersed with sharper expressions, such as referring to vaccine recommenders as "executioners" [or "cutthroats"]. The appeal addresses both specific facts (deaths) and procedural failures.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in plenary sessions, asking questions and demanding clarification from the rapporteur. He/She refers to his/her previous activity in the Riigikogu, having participated in the establishment of the support group for investigating side effects.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong criticism has been leveled at state institutions (the Health Board) and other officials, who are accused of failing to investigate and improperly classifying adverse effects. The criticism is both procedural and ethical in nature, stemming from the suspicion of conflicts of interest among those recommending the vaccines. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a comprehensive investigation is being demanded.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperative approach emphasizes the need for international collaboration, calling for the inclusion of foreign experts in the proposed investigation commission. Domestically, there is a reference to participation in the Riigikogu support group for investigating side effects, which indicates a readiness to cooperate with certain colleagues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is both national (Estonian government agencies, the Riigikogu) and international, referencing the USA as the home of the largest vaccine manufacturers and highlighting the necessity of international cooperation. There is no specific emphasis placed on local or regional Estonian issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is public health and the state's responsibility in investigating adverse events and fatalities linked to vaccination. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of ensuring citizen safety and the transparency of government agencies regarding health issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward the creation of an investigative commission to ensure a thorough investigation of state agencies' activities regarding vaccine side effects and conflicts of interest. The speaker is acting as an initiator/supporter in ensuring oversight and accountability, also referencing the work of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) support group.
2 Speeches Analyzed