Agenda Profile: Anti Poolamets
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law Enforcement Act (163 SE)
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position strongly advocates for the defense of the nation-state and the rights of the indigenous population, sharply opposing the multicultural state structure, which is deemed an unconstitutional dystopia. The discourse is value-based, focusing intensely on cultural conflict, the protection of women’s dignity, and the threat of terrorism. The speaker stands against privileges granted to immigrants and demands the protection of the integrity of the Estonian cultural space.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding cultural conflicts and the threat of terrorism, referencing specific events in Europe (Paris, Stockholm, Turku) and international examples (Saudi Arabia, France, Denmark, Norway). This expertise is based on citing reports from the Security Police (Kapo), which address the growth of the Islamic community, "immigration pumps" (universities), and the likelihood of radicalization. The speaker uses terms such as "Sharia" and "pharisaical protection of women" to describe these cultural phenomena.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is extremely combative, emotional, and accusatory, employing strong words of moral condemnation such as "shame," "pharisaical," and "dystopia." The speaker utilizes dramatic contrasts and labels the opponents' actions as the implementation of communist goals. The appeals are primarily emotional and ideological, while simultaneously relying on data cited by security agencies.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speech was delivered in the Riigikogu during the first reading of the draft Act amending the Law Enforcement Act. Previous trips to Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries are mentioned, which are used as cultural reference material.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the Social Democrats and their leader Ossinovski, who stand accused of waging war against the constitutional nation-state and aiming to establish an international state. The criticism is intense and ideological, labeling the opponents' actions as the pharisaical humiliation of women and the importation of artificial risk. Compromise is ruled out, as this constitutes an existential cultural conflict.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
No data available.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is placed on the national level (the Estonian cultural space, the nation-state) and international comparisons, stressing that Estonia must follow the lead of other European countries (France, Denmark, Norway) in banning face coverings. Concrete examples of the threat of terrorism and cultural conflicts are drawn from Stockholm, Turku, and Paris.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker adopts a strong position against immigration, particularly concerning cultures that bring about the degradation of women (face coverings, female genital mutilation) and the risk of a Sharia society emerging. Instead of focusing on the balance between security and civil liberties, the speaker emphasizes cultural self-defense and the supremacy of national customs.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on the draft amendment to the Law Enforcement Act (Bill 163 SE), which is being utilized as a platform to address issues of cultural conflict and security. The speaker is strongly opposed to the current political course and supports decisive measures, such as banning face coverings, in order to protect women’s dignity and national security.
1 Speeches Analyzed