Agenda Profile: Anti Poolamets
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Medicines Act (Bill 162 SE)
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political position vehemently opposes amendments to the European medicinal products regulation that would permit medicines lacking scientific substantiation to be introduced to the market during an emergency. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the protection of public health, the avoidance of life-threatening legislation, and adherence to Section 18 of the Constitution. The speaker accuses politicians and the media of spreading misinformation and suppressing information regarding side effects during the pandemic.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding pharmaceutical regulations, particularly the amendments to the European Medicines Regulation, and cites specific examples from medical history (Pfizer fines, the Pandemrix vaccine). The importance of the scientific requirement (comprehensive studies) is emphasized, and reference is made to Article 18 of the Constitution. This knowledge is further supported by personal examples drawn from the experiences of healthcare professionals.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly critical and accusatory, employing emotional appeals and strong language such as "fraud," "criminal offenses," and "life-threatening laws." Logical arguments (regarding the danger of the regulations) are interwoven with specific historical examples (Pfizer's fines) and personal narratives (the experiences of school healthcare workers). The speaker requests additional time to present further evidence, demonstrating a desire to address the topic comprehensively.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the first reading of the draft law (Bill 162 SE) and refers to previous work in the European Union Affairs Committee, where amendments to the European Medicines Regulation were discussed.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are pharmaceutical companies (especially Pfizer, which is labeled criminal and untrustworthy) and politicians/experts (such as Irja Lutsar) who promoted false claims about vaccines. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of fraud, cover-ups, and violating the constitution. The speaker refers to the pharmaceutical companies' activities as a "serious criminal offense."
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
In terms of cooperation, reference was made to a support group initiated by Dr. Everaus to address vaccine side effects, demonstrating support for colleagues facing similar concerns. The speaker remains open to continuing work on the draft bill within the committees, but strictly within the context of submitting specific comments and proposals, and not for the purpose of mitigating fundamental opposition.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is mainly on international regulations (the European medicinal product regulation) and the activities of large pharmaceutical companies in the US and Europe (the Pandemrix cases in Finland and Sweden). In the Estonian context, the mayor of Rakvere and a school nurse are mentioned to illustrate the consequences of the pandemic at the local level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic viewpoints are expressed in strong distrust of major pharmaceutical companies, who are accused of lying and engaging in deceptive marketing practices for the sake of profit (billions). Stricter regulation and accountability for corporate crimes are demanded, arguing that the profit motive has been placed above people's health.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is public health and medical ethics, emphasizing the violation of Article 18 of the Constitution (which prohibits forced submission to medical or scientific experiments). There is strong opposition to the suppression of side effects and mandatory vaccination, citing examples of the suffering experienced by healthcare workers.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on opposing the draft Act amending the Medicinal Products Act (162 SE), as it is linked to the direction of the European Medicines Regulation, which permits the marketing of medicinal products without prior studies. The speaker is a strong opponent of the draft, demanding vigilance and issuing a warning against potentially life-threatening legislation.
3 Speeches Analyzed