Agenda Profile: Anti Poolamets
Inquiry Regarding Plans for the Construction of a Wind Farm on Saaremaa (No. 680)
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political stance is adamantly opposed to the green transition and the establishment of offshore wind farms, which are considered detrimental, ineffective "junk technology," and "climate mythology." The position is intensely value-driven, emphasizing the need to halt the project to minimize immediate damage. The main focus is on the economic detriment and ideological deception associated with the 2.6 billion euro investment.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the technical risks associated with wind generators (oil leaks, oil volumes in the machinery, risk of collapse) and the uncertainty surrounding economic projections. Specific financial figures (2.6 billion) are cited, and reference is made to environmental impacts, such as the intensity of bird migration routes and the Baltic Sea fishing grounds. Scientists (Lippmaa, Raukas) and businesses (Estonian Cell) are also referenced to support their arguments.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, urgent, and alarmist, employing strong labels such as "climate mythology," "racket," and "Lysenkoism." Both economic arguments (competitiveness) and emotional appeals are utilized, accusing opponents of deceit, cowardice, and a lack of transparency. Ironic quoting (Greta Thunberg) and historical parallels are also employed.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
No data available.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the supporters of the green transition, the Climate Minister, "lying politicians," and the leadership of the European Union (von der Leyen's circle). The criticism is sharply ideological, accusing opponents of corruption, distorting science, and non-transparent procedures (the closed doors of the special anti-corruption committee). Compromise is ruled out, and the immediate termination of the projects is demanded.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
They do not discuss cooperation within parliament, but instead cite external support—for example, from entrepreneurs (Estonian Cell) and scientists critical of the green transition—to legitimize their stance. There is absolutely no indication of any willingness to compromise with political opponents.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on Estonian regional projects, particularly the offshore wind farms of Saaremaa and the Gulf of Riga, highlighting their detrimental impact on the residents of Saaremaa and local fishing grounds. Damage to heritage landscapes is also stressed, as they are being transformed into an "industrial landscape of wind turbine clutter."
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views emphasize competitiveness and are strongly opposed to state subsidies for unprofitable projects, labeling them "junk technology." Warnings are issued against the dissolution of the European economy, and support is voiced for entrepreneurs suffering due to unpredictable energy policy. They demand an economy that generates revenue, rather than one that forces people to pay up.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Social issues are not the focus. The need to protect heritage landscapes from becoming industrial landscapes is mentioned, highlighting visual damage and the reduction in property value.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is the immediate suspension of wind farm construction and the termination of the green transition policy, in order to prevent damage to society and the economy. The speaker is an active opponent in the context of the inquiry and criticizes the ministry and the special committee on anti-corruption for their opaque handling of affairs.
3 Speeches Analyzed