By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The rhetorical style is sharp, concerned, and interrogative, focusing on demanding accountability from the minister and the rapporteur. The speaker employs both legal precision (citing the law) and a personal anecdote and hypothetical example to underscore the severity of the issues and the system's vulnerability.

The rhetorical style is highly aggressive, emotional, and accusatory, employing sharp phrases such as "political pornography" and "embarrassing nonsense." The speaker frequently poses rhetorical questions designed to cast doubt on the government's motives and competence (e.g., "Is our budget truly in such a critical state?"). The tone is overwhelmingly ironic and indignant, framing the government's actions in a ridiculous light.