By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The opposition is aimed at local businessmen who profit from municipal assets, and the local government which sells property for next to nothing. The criticism is intense and focuses on a pattern of corrupt behavior and political deception, where the formation of electoral alliances is used to try and conceal the same old players. The criticism targets ethical and procedural violations.

The confrontation is aimed at the policies of the "liberals," who are criticized for basing their decisions on European models while completely ignoring Estonian purchasing power and wage levels. The criticism is also leveled at the government’s fiscal priorities, which favor foreign aid over ensuring domestic financial stability.

The main opponents are the government and the Reform Party, especially Kaja Kallas and Mart Võrklaev, who are accused of starting with a lie and running the budget into the ground. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the government’s dishonesty and the violation of parliamentary practices through the restriction of opposition rights. A compromise regarding the car tax is completely ruled out.

Strong opposition is aimed at the policies of the Prime Minister and the government, particularly concerning taxation and budgetary decisions. The criticism is rooted in policy and philosophy, accusing the government of favoring foreign big capital over the Estonian people and protecting banks. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, opponents are demanding a clear justification for the government's logic and choices.

The main opponents are the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of serving the interests of foreign major banks and squeezing every last cent out of the Estonian people. The criticism is intense, focusing on unfair tax policy choices and the deliberate stalling of the draft legislation. The government's communication strategy is accused of creating an atmosphere of fear ("Estonia is at war!"), which ultimately scares off investments.

The main criticism is directed against the Government of the Republic, which is accused of failing to resolve the situation where service workers in the capital do not speak Estonian. The criticism is based on policy and performance, demanding concrete steps from the government to put an end to the situation.