By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The standoff is directed at the government's actions or inadequate procedures for vetting recipients of temporary protection. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the necessity of preventing the misuse of benefits and demanding explanations from the minister regarding how the checks are being implemented.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the governing coalition (Eesti 200, Social Democrats), who are being sharply criticized for their incompetence, ineptitude, and foolish decisions. The criticism targets specific policies (the car tax, uncontrolled spending) as well as the government’s attitude (PR spin, brainwashing). Compromise is ruled out; the objective is to consign the government and its policies to the "dustbin of history."

The primary adversaries are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are facing criticism for passing the VAT hike. The criticism is intense and policy-focused, accusing the government of actively seeking excuses not to support tax reductions. Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi is mentioned specifically, with predictions that he will compel the coalition partners to bend to his will.

The main confrontation is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are criticized for poor procedural decisions (the timing of the desynchronization) and for inaction (a non-functioning electricity exchange). The criticism is intense and focuses on demanding accountability, asking who exactly made the decisions.

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is sharply criticized for its incompetent response and the destruction of the energy sector. Criticism is aimed both at their policies (tax hikes, attacking oil shale) and the nature of the government’s actions (dishonesty, shortsightedness). Eesti 200 and the Sotsid are also under attack as cheerleaders of the Reform Party and implementers of submissive policy.