By Months: Õnne Pillak

Total Months: 10

Fully Profiled: 10

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
12.2024

1 Speeches

The opposition is aimed at the proposal to remove the third item from the agenda. The criticism is purely procedural and relates to the organization of the session's work.
Details View Details
11.2024

5 Speeches

The main opponents are the Centre Party faction, along with Urmas Reinsalu and Helle-Moonika Helme, whose proposals for changing the agenda are not supported by the faction. The opposition is strictly procedural, focusing on blocking any changes to the agenda. The stance on these issues is firm and uncompromising.
Details View Details
10.2024

3 Speeches

The speaker, on behalf of the Reform Party, expresses strong opposition to changing the agenda and adopts a critical position toward the government regarding budget cuts. This opposition is directed at the government's policy and the procedures of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), demanding guarantees from the government concerning the inviolability of social benefits.
Details View Details
09.2024

5 Speeches

The speaker politically criticizes two opposing approaches to organizing state finances: the rapid escalation of the state's debt burden and a sharp increase in the tax burden. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing that these choices would lead to instability and hinder economic growth. Furthermore, they contrast with Isamaa's proposals, requesting that they be voted down on behalf of the Reform Party faction.
Details View Details
07.2024

3 Speeches

The opposition is being criticized for trying to blow the issue out of proportion and minimizing the necessary changes made for people with disabilities. The speaker acknowledges that convincing the opposition to support the motor vehicle tax is impossible, but demands that they recognize the importance of the accompanying support measures. The criticism is based on policy and procedure.
Details View Details
06.2024

5 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the opposition (EKREIKE deputies, the Center Party), accusing them of deception, lying, and hypocrisy concerning the past taxation of pensions. It strongly refutes claims about cutting pensions, labeling them as falsehoods, and criticizes the Center Party for its unfulfilled election promises.
Details View Details
05.2024

4 Speeches

The primary target of criticism is the Centre Party, which is being blamed for its previous failure to increase benefits for disabled adults during the economic boom. The criticism is policy-based and intense, directly refuting the opposing side's claims regarding the initiation of social measures.
Details View Details
04.2024

4 Speeches

Political opponents are not criticized; instead, we address the objections and proposals submitted by interest groups (e.g., the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Chamber of Bailiffs). Opposition to the proposals is justified by the requirements concerning resources (medical personnel/capacity) and international law (the European Social Charter). Criticism is directed at the details of policy implementation, not the general objective of the draft legislation.
Details View Details
03.2024

19 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the opposition's claims that nothing has been done for families with children, a point to which the speaker responds with a list of specific legislative amendments. He/She notes that the opposition (the EKRE faction) prolonged the adoption of some changes and submitted numerous mutually exclusive amendments. The speaker argues against simplified solutions (e.g., merely raising benefits), emphasizing the complex and multifaceted nature of families' needs.
Details View Details
02.2024

1 Speeches

The speaker assumes unanimous support for the declaration and expresses surprise should it not be forthcoming, indicating a lack of resistance on the matter being addressed. Direct criticism of opponents is absent.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling