By Plenary Sessions: Heljo Pikhof

The rhetorical style is critical and analytical, focusing on highlighting the injustice towards landowners whom the state is compensating with a modest sum. The speaker uses formal language, posing two specific questions to the Prime Minister regarding the government's plans. Rhetorical astonishment is also employed concerning the compensation being termed a "benefit" that is subject to income tax.

The style is formal, addressing the minister respectfully, but the content is sharply critical and confrontational. Strong, emotionally charged imagery is used ("70% into tree plantations") along with rhetorical questions to emphasize the flawed nature of the government's direction.

The rhetorical style is formal and concerned, stressing the gravity of the proposed change by labeling it a "big problem." The speaker poses a direct question to the presenter, demanding explicit assurance and accountability for the social ramifications of the draft legislation.

The style is direct, corrective, and demands accountability, utilizing both pointed questions and fact-based referencing to the history of legislation (a procedural matter). The tone is formal and focuses on clarifying political positions and ensuring the accuracy of historical facts.