By Years: Tõnis Mölder

The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, often emphasizing the need to correct the official transcript or present the commission's positions. Although the tone is mostly neutral and fact-based, direct questions are also used to challenge opponents' claims, and there are occasional light rhetorical jabs ("where has this mosquito bitten the social democrats").

The style is analytical and procedural, requiring detailed responses and deeper substantive insight from ministers. It employs rhetorical questions and strong analogies (for example, the shift of excise duties to Latvia, or labeling the draft law a "sham") to highlight the deficiencies in political decisions. The overall tone is concerned, demanding, and stresses the importance of transparency in the communication of state agencies.