By Months: Tõnis Mölder

The rhetorical style is formal, parliamentary, and analytical, focusing on logical questions and data. The tone is respectful ("Dear Minister," "Thank you for the overview"), but demanding, requesting detailed answers—in writing if necessary—and referencing ministry aides. Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is placed on facts and financial mechanisms.

The style is formal and respectful towards the minister, who is thanked for their presence, emphasizing the importance of the debate. At the same time, the style becomes ironic and dismissive when criticizing opponents (the Social Democrats), employing figurative language ("where has this mosquito bitten the Social Democrats").

The style is highly formal, procedural, and analytical, especially in the commission's reports, where detailed discussions are documented. The speaker relies on institutional references and documents in their arguments (e.g., assessments by legal experts, the Chamber of Commerce) to be persuasive and refute the opposing party's claims. The tone is predominantly neutral and fact-based, avoiding emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is formal, precise, and focuses on correcting facts within an official context ("For the record"). The speaker employs logical appeal, avoiding emotional expressions and emphasizing that the purpose of their intervention is to ensure procedural accuracy.