By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The speaker focuses intensely on social issues, particularly the insufficient level of subsistence benefits and the effect of tax increases on low-income individuals. They adopt a clearly critical stance towards the government's social policy, highlighting the disparity between the salary hikes for state officials and the actual level of subsistence benefits. The speaker supports increasing national defense funding but demands clear funding sources, including the consideration of a bank tax.

The speaker focuses on security issues, particularly combating online fraud and scams. He takes a clearly supportive stance regarding increased cooperation between government agencies to mitigate security risks.

The speaker adopts a clearly oppositional stance toward the governing coalition, strongly criticizing the tax increases and deficiencies in social policy. He highlights the financial struggles of the Estonian people in making ends meet and demands relief, arguing that the subsistence allowance provided is ridiculous. Furthermore, the speaker accuses the Reform Party of pre-election deception, noting that the tax hikes were not discussed before the elections.

The speaker heavily focuses on criticizing the healthcare system, highlighting the doctor shortage, long waiting times, and issues with service accessibility. They take a distinctly critical stance toward the government's healthcare policy, demanding concrete solutions for the recruitment of new family doctors and the improvement of services in rural areas. Furthermore, they criticize the government's tax policy, referencing the "tax sprees" and demanding a clear strategy.

The Speaker strongly supports the construction of the Tallinn Hospital, while criticizing its politicization and expressing optimism about the project. He adopts a critical stance regarding the healthcare system, highlighting issues concerning the accessibility of free services and lengthy waiting lists. As a member of the Centre Party, he views the upcoming elections as an anticipated opportunity for the public to assess the current government.

The speaker adopts a distinctly critical stance toward the government's infrastructure projects, particularly regarding the Tallinn-Vilnius rail line. They express strong skepticism about the project's justification and efficacy, highlighting the waste of taxpayer money during a difficult economic period. This position is clearly oppositional and aimed at challenging the validity of the government's decisions.

The speaker focuses heavily on energy security issues, advocating for the continued use of oil shale and the search for technological solutions to meet the European Union's emissions requirements. They express concern regarding regional policy, criticizing the consolidation and closure of public services in local areas. The speaker stresses the need to strike a balance between national austerity measures and preserving the citizens' sense of fairness and entitlement.