By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

Supports a more progressive tax policy, including considering a bank tax to fund national defense. It criticizes the disproportionate impact of tax hikes on low-income individuals. It calls for greater attention to income inequality and the strengthening of social protection.

Not enough data is available.

Expresses clear opposition to tax hikes and demands an increase in social benefits. It criticizes the government's economic policy, arguing that it is undermining the livelihood of the Estonian people. It supports strengthening social protection and reducing the tax burden, or at the very least, ensuring it is not increased.

They criticize the government's tax policy, referencing the recent "tax sprees" in a negative light. They demand a clear economic strategy from the government but fail to adequately present concrete economic views.

It supports public sector investments in healthcare, specifically inquiring about funding from state, municipal, and EU sources. It criticizes the current situation where quality services are accessible only to those who can pay. Furthermore, it demonstrates an understanding of the necessity for diverse funding streams when undertaking major projects.

The speaker expresses strong concern over the use of taxpayer money, stressing the need for efficiency and proper justification in government investments. He/She highlights the context of economically difficult times and questions the necessity of subsidies. The economic views presented are fiscally conservative, demanding the responsible use of public funds.

Supports the preservation of the oil shale industry through technological investments, indicating a commitment to protecting specific sectors. It critically questions the rationale behind saving 600,000 euros when weighed against the potential impact on public trust, demonstrating an unwillingness to blindly endorse cost-cutting measures.