Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-11
Political Position
The political position is vehemently opposed to the rushed closure of the border crossing points with Russia, viewing the proposed bill as a mere political slogan that disregards the actual consequences. It is stressed that decisions made by the Riigikogu (Parliament) must consider the lives of real people, rather than just ideological noise. This stance is deeply rooted in policy and values, demanding strategic leadership and foresight.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in border policy, local representation, and humanitarian considerations, citing the decisions of the Seto Congress and the positions of the Ministry of the Interior. Comparisons are used with other NATO countries (Poland, Norway) regarding the management of borders with Russia to support the argument for an open border. [The discussion] assumes knowledge of Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and argumentative, balancing emotional appeals (such as references to graves and families) with logical demands (specifically, the lack of impact assessments). It frequently employs antithesis (e.g., "politics is not slogans") and cites authoritative sources to underscore the necessity of inclusion. The tone is formal, yet the substance is sharp and accusatory.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The patterns of activity are limited to asking questions during the debate on the bill and delivering a longer speech at the plenary session. Questions are directed both to the rapporteur and the previous speaker, demanding information regarding government reports and clearances. Data is lacking concerning other events or regular interaction.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at the bill’s initiators (Isamaa is specifically named) and the government. They are accused of prioritizing political slogans and deliberately ignoring local residents (the Setos, people from the Petseri area). The criticism is intense, focusing on both procedural failures (specifically, a lack of inclusion/engagement) and strategic shortcomings. The opponents are further criticized for punishing Estonian citizens simply because of where they live.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative approach emphasizes mandatory inclusion and consultation, particularly with representatives of Setomaa, before any decisions affecting the border are made. It calls for the draft bill to be sent back for comprehensive revision, indicating a willingness to compromise, provided the impacts are assessed and the public is engaged.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is heavily regional, concentrating specifically on the lives and issues facing the residents of Setomaa and Petserimaa who live close to the control line. There is also mention of the people of Narva and businesses located near the border. Furthermore, the necessity of taking into account the decisions made by the local representative body (the Seto Congress), which speaks for 30,000 Setomaa residents, is stressed.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on preventing negative indirect harm and require a thorough economic impact assessment on border residents and businesses. There is a warning that the state must not be heavy-handed if it is unaware of the economic consequences of its decision.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, emphasis is placed on humanitarian considerations related to border crossing (graves, the elderly, properties). It strongly defends the right of Estonian citizens living near the border to be included and not to be penalized because of their geography.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is the opposition to a specific draft law concerning the closure of the control line with Russia. There is a demand for the bill to be rejected or sent back for comprehensive revision until all potential impacts have been assessed and local stakeholders have been involved. Furthermore, inquiries are being made regarding the progress of the report promised by the government.
3 Speeches Analyzed