Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-03
Political Position
The political focus is strongly directed toward social justice and supporting vulnerable groups (pensioners, people experiencing economic hardship). Immediate and symbolically significant steps are being demanded, such as a pension supplement and raising the shamefully low subsistence level. The political stance is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of a just and humane state. Swift action is also required in regulating public safety.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of social policy, referencing specific figures (a subsistence minimum of 200 euros) and previous ministry promises regarding the establishment of commissions. Knowledge of traffic safety regulation measures is also highlighted, such as raising the minimum age, and regulating speed and parking. Specific questions are posed regarding the conditions for the supplementary pension (age restriction, income).
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and insistent, employing strong emotional appeals, particularly when describing the poverty line as "shameful." Direct questions and moral arguments (referred to as an "undeniable truth") are used to underscore the state's responsibility and criticize bureaucratic foot-dragging. The tone is anxious and demands swift action, also referencing dangerous events in Latvia.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Speaking activity was concentrated on a single day of the plenary session (03.11.2025). The pattern demonstrates continuity, as reference is made to an earlier question posed to the Minister of Social Affairs in February or March, indicating long-term monitoring of the subject. The speaker is an active questioner, submitting detailed and critical follow-up questions to the rapporteurs.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed against the inaction and bureaucratic delays by the government and the former Minister of Social Affairs, particularly concerning the raising of the subsistence level. The 200-euro limit is sharply criticized as disgraceful, and the establishment of a commission—whose findings will only be released in the spring of 2026—is condemned. Attempts to remove the topic of pensioner assistance from the agenda are also facing criticism.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There are no direct references to cooperation with other political parties; the tone is rather demanding and seems aimed at holding the presenter accountable. They want to know whether the commission has discussed alternative options for assisting the elderly, which suggests an openness to finding solutions.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly domestic, addressing Estonian pensioners, the subsistence minimum, and relevant legislation. Events in Latvia are mentioned only as an example to underscore the urgency of Estonia's domestic safety regulations.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views strongly support social redistribution and increased government spending aimed at supporting vulnerable groups. Calls are being made to find budgetary resources to raise the subsistence minimum, stressing that the current level doesn't even cover the cost of essential goods. Support is also given to a symbolically significant pension supplement designed to alleviate the effects of rising prices.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issues are poverty and economic vulnerability among the elderly, single parents, and the unemployed, who are considered value creators. The topic is framed as a question of the state's humanity and justice. Furthermore, the need to improve public safety is emphasized in connection with the regulation of light traffic vehicles.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on the swift amendment of social welfare laws (specifically the subsistence level and pension supplements) and the strengthening of traffic safety regulations. The speaker is demanding that the legislative process be expedited so that these measures can take effect by the new year, rather than waiting for the commission's findings until the spring of 2026. The objective is to raise the minimum age requirement and regulate both speeding and parking.
5 Speeches Analyzed