Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2024-07-29
Political Position
The speaker clearly advocates for reducing bureaucracy, arguing that car tax exemptions would be simpler than compensation mechanisms. He strongly criticizes the redistribution of funds among local municipalities, even comparing it to collectivization. He demands the restoration of the previous tax system, which would ensure fairer treatment for all local governments.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Shows a strong grasp of local government finance, referencing specific figures and changes to the tax system. Demonstrates knowledge regarding the impact of land tax redistribution on various municipalities. Uses precise examples of losses incurred by Harju County parishes, which indicates profound knowledge in the field of regional administration.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
They employ emotionally charged comparisons (like collectivization) and rhetorical questions to underscore their positions. The speaking tone is critical and direct, particularly when addressing bureaucracy and injustice. Historical references are combined with modern political arguments to enhance the persuasiveness of their views.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participated in the XV Riigikogu's extraordinary session on July 29, 2024, posing four consecutive questions on the same subject. The remarks were brief and specific, focusing on car tax issues and the financing of local governments.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker voiced clear opposition to the government's car tax policy, criticizing both the increase in bureaucracy and the unreasonable nature of the redistribution. The fairness of redistributing funds among local municipalities was criticized particularly harshly, with the speaker pointing out that millions of euros had already been taken previously without the promised compensation.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker interacted courteously with the rapporteurs, using the standard forms of address, "respected rapporteur" and "dear rapporteur." The questions were constructive and sought specific answers, but showed no signs of willingness to compromise regarding the government's policy.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker represents Harju County and focused heavily on regional issues. Specifically, they mentioned the "golden ring" surrounding Tartu and Tallinn, the city of Maardu, Viimsi Parish, and Lääne-Harju Parish. It was stressed that they represent the entirety of Harju County, not just individual municipalities.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker advocates for the simplification of the tax system and fewer bureaucratic solutions. He expressed opposition to the redistribution of funds from wealthier regions to poorer ones, emphasizing that richer areas also bear greater responsibilities. He wishes to restore the former tax system, which would ensure fairer treatment for everyone.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker expressed concern about the situation of large families and people with disabilities in the context of the motor vehicle tax, advocating for tax exemptions for them instead of bureaucratic compensation mechanisms. No other social issues were covered in the speeches.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker focused on car tax regulations and issues concerning local government financing. They inquired whether the reinstatement of the tax system had been discussed in the committees and if the Ministry of Social Affairs regulations were already being drafted. They emphasized the need for less bureaucratic solutions.
4 Speeches Analyzed