Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE) - first reading
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The speaker adopts a clearly critical stance regarding the EE-ALARM system, arguing that it is technically infeasible and unreliable. He stresses the necessity of utilizing functional solutions already implemented in other countries (Finland, Israel) and calls for more comprehensive technical testing. The speaker supports advancing the bill to the second reading, but insists on substantial amendments and additions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates deep technical knowledge in the field of communication networks and crisis notification systems, utilizing specific terminology such as mobile operator networks, SMS traffic loads, and radio frequencies. References concrete technological solutions implemented in other countries and emphasizes the expert opinions of communication network engineers. Also demonstrates knowledge regarding the possibilities for integrating mobile applications.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It uses an emotional and cautionary tone, emphasizing urgency with the phrase "we do not have the time or the luxury to make mistakes." It combines technical arguments with dramatic metaphors ("the cornerstone is laid on sand"). It addresses the public directly ("Dear Estonian people!") and uses rhetorical questions to underscore the criticism.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
During this period, [he/she] limited participation to the parliamentary session, delivering three speeches on the same day. [He/She] demonstrated active engagement in the discussions, posing clarifying questions to the minister. [He/She] also referenced a previous inability to speak ("The previous presiding officer did not allow me to speak").
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharply criticizes the government’s approach to the EE-ALARM system, labeling it "armchair planning" and accusing them of technological backwardness. They argue that the current approach is irresponsible and could cost human lives in a crisis situation. Criticism is also directed at the management of the parliament, citing obstacles to speaking out.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
He emphasized his readiness for cooperation, stating, "we can work together to improve this law, which is so crucial for the people." He supports a constructive approach, recommending that the bill be advanced to the second reading while simultaneously incorporating amendments. He also indicated his willingness to submit proposals and amendments during the interim period.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Based on the data, there is not enough information.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
A specific sum (100,000 euros) is mentioned for system testing, which demonstrates a pragmatic approach to making the necessary investments. It is emphasized that technological solutions require adequate funding and testing prior to implementation.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It emphasizes the needs of various population groups, particularly ensuring that crisis information reaches the elderly and those who do not use smart devices. It expresses concern regarding the inclusion of all segments of society in emergency notification systems.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the draft amendment to the Emergency Situation Act, particularly the technical side of the EE-ALARM system and the regulation of shelters. It calls for a more comprehensive approach to the legal framework for crisis communication, including clarification of the right and mechanisms for interrupting radio stations.
4 Speeches Analyzed