Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov

Inquiry regarding the construction of Via Baltica (no. 734)

2025-05-19

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Political Position
The speaker adopts a clear stance on transport infrastructure issues, expressing significant skepticism regarding the Rail Baltic project while simultaneously supporting the development of the Via Baltica road link. This position is both pragmatic and security-centric, underscoring the necessity of having parallel connections to Europe.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of transport infrastructure and military logistics, referencing the opinions of military personnel and rail specialists regarding the vulnerability of Rail Baltic. (He/She) uses technical arguments when comparing rail and road connections.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetoric is direct and inquisitive, employing practical examples ("some sort of little rocket is flying around here"). The style is more argument-based than emotional, focusing on logical counter-arguments to the prime minister's position.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker disputes the Prime Minister's stance on the military significance of Rail Baltic, using expert opinions to support their argument. The criticism is policy-focused, not personal.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Focuses on connectivity issues between the Baltic states and Europe, emphasizing the strategic importance of regional transport infrastructure.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is insufficient data.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the issue of completing the Via Baltica highway, which involves participating in formal inquiries (interpellations) and seeking to influence transport policy priorities. The role adopted is primarily that of an inquirer and someone who proposes alternatives.

3 Speeches Analyzed