Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the circumstances related to the termination of Nordica’s activities” (543 OE)
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the cessation of Nordica's operations, clearly stating that an investigative committee is essential. His position is that Nordica's failure resulted primarily from poor management, rather than a lack of funding. The speaker also extends this concern to other major projects, such as Rail Baltic, demonstrating a broader skepticism toward state project management.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the aviation sector and large infrastructure projects, specifically referencing Nordica’s management issues and the Rail Baltic project. They employ an analytical approach, posing causal questions to differentiate between management and funding. Their expertise is evident in their understanding of project management risks.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs interrogative and probing rhetoric, directing pointed questions toward the rapporteur. His style is polite yet critical, utilizing traditional parliamentary forms of address ("Esteemed Chair," "Dear Rapporteur"). The rhetoric is logical and evidence-based, focusing on establishing cause-and-effect relationships.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions about activity patterns.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker is voicing criticism regarding Nordica's management, but not on a personal level. The criticism is systemic and addresses the state's project management capabilities more broadly. The opposition is being constructive—it supports forming an investigative committee to solve the problems, rather than simply assigning blame.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by supporting the formation of the investigation committee and engaging in a constructive dialogue with the rapporteur. Their approach is geared towards collaboration rather than confrontation, as they seek to clarify the root causes of the problems.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker focuses on national projects and nationwide issues, mentioning Nordica and Rail Baltic as state-level initiatives. Regional aspects are not addressed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker expresses concern regarding the efficient use of state resources, stressing that good management is the key factor for project success. He clearly differentiates management issues from funding issues, pointing to a pragmatic economic mindset.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Based on limited data, it is impossible to draw conclusions about social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker actively supports the formation of an investigative commission to examine the circumstances surrounding the termination of Nordica's operations. His legislative focus is on matters of oversight and accountability, emphasizing the necessity of clarifying the reasons behind the failure of state projects.
2 Speeches Analyzed