Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to the car tax, which is viewed as the primary cause of low public trust (30%) and the decline in defense readiness. The speaker demands the complete abolition of the tax, deeming the proposed relief insufficient. The criticism focuses on the government's performance (performance-driven) and adherence to social justice (value-driven), emphasizing the need to improve the livelihoods of poorer people.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of public opinion polls, referencing a specific 30% confidence rating regarding the Riigikogu and the government. They are familiar with the specifics of tax policy, criticizing the rhetoric surrounding the raising and subsequent withdrawal of income tax, as well as the impact of the proposed car tax on the economy and various social groups.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and confrontational, using rhetorical questions to challenge the minister's decisions and inquire about the rationale behind the policy. The appeals are a blend of logic (citing confidence percentages) and social emotion, highlighting the hardships faced by the less fortunate.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker participated in the first reading of the draft law (Draft Law Amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act) held on October 6, 2025. No other activity patterns exist.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponent is the government and the minister, who are being criticized for implementing the car tax and their income tax policy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of low public trust and ignoring poorer people, while demanding the complete withdrawal of the policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
A collaborative approach is absent; the speaker is engaging in direct confrontation with the minister, posing pointed questions and demanding the policy's immediate revocation. No willingness to compromise is demonstrated.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is entirely national, addressing nationwide tax policy, public trust, and social well-being. Specific regional or international topics are not covered.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker is strongly against the car tax, viewing it as damaging to the economy and social well-being. He supports tax policies that stimulate the economy (referencing income tax rhetoric) and emphasizes the need to offer financial relief to poorer people and ensure their ability to cope.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social focus is economic well-being and poverty. The speaker stresses that the government needs to pay attention to other poorer groups as well, not just families with children, and that the car tax directly impacts people's willingness to defend the country.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on opposing the draft bill (694 SE) to amend the Motor Vehicle Tax Act. The speaker is against the proposal, demanding not just mitigation, but the complete repeal of the tax itself.
3 Speeches Analyzed