Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
Articulates strong opposition to the security tax, criticizing its impact on low-income individuals and dismissing it as a mere PR stunt. Supports the alternative tax options proposed by the Centre Party. Expresses general dissatisfaction with the government’s performance, claiming that they haven't managed to pass a single decent law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge in the field of tax policy, particularly concerning land tax issues, highlighting specific problems related to Viimsi municipality, Maardu city, and Lääne-Harju municipality. Shows understanding of issues surrounding the state's debt burden and compares Estonia's position with that of other countries. References the historical dogmas of the Reform Party regarding lending policy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs an emotional and confrontational approach, combining personal experiences ("I travel extensively throughout Estonia") with fact-based arguments. The rhetoric is direct and provocative, utilizing irony ("You are very brave!") and rhetorical questions. The criticism is balanced by an acknowledgment of the respondent's courage.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Mentions active travel throughout Estonia and regular communication with citizens. Actively participates in parliamentary debates, asking questions and following up on topics in multiple interventions. Demonstrates consistent engagement with tax issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
It sharply criticizes the government and its tax policy, accusing them of exploiting poor people. It claims that the government uses the label of "security" to silence the opposition and brand them as enemies of the people. The opposition is principled and uncompromising.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
This refers to the cooperation between the Center Party and other opposition parties in proposing alternative tax solutions. It commends the respondent's courage for appearing to answer uncomfortable questions, demonstrating courtesy in personal interactions despite the political opposition.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Focuses on specific issues within local governments, specifically naming Viimsi Parish, the city of Maardu, and Lääne-Harju Parish. It stresses the financial strain on these local authorities stemming from state-mandated obligations. It also mentions broad-based communication with people throughout Estonia.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The text supports the state taking on debt to alleviate the tax burden on citizens, criticizing the Reform Party's conservative borrowing policy as an outdated dogma. It argues that Estonia's low debt level allows for greater borrowing capacity. Furthermore, it opposes tax increases, particularly those impacting lower-income individuals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on activities opposing the draft security tax bill, presenting critical analysis and questions. It addresses tax legislation issues more broadly, including land tax reform. It emphasizes the opposition's role in offering alternative legislative solutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed