By Months: Marko Mihkelson

The rhetorical style is formal and professional, addressing the Vice-Chairman of the Riigikogu respectfully. The speech is brief and focuses exclusively on conveying information, explaining the background of the amendment and the procedural process without emotional or persuasive appeals.

The rhetorical style is highly formal and procedural, focusing on logical argumentation and the precise description of procedural details. The tone is explanatory and authoritative, addressing objections (Urmas Reinsalu) with legal justifications, and emphasizing the relevance of the constitution and the explanatory memorandum. Emotional appeals are not employed; the emphasis is placed on facts and legislative correctness.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and extremely forceful, emphasizing the seriousness of the existential threat and the need to avoid historical mistakes. The speaker uses logical arguments and historical examples to justify the need for swift and fundamental security decisions, also citing the director of British foreign intelligence (MI6) and a former US president.

The style is formal and analytical, beginning with the facilitation of commission procedures, but becoming pressing and emotionally charged during the debate. Strong historical parallels are employed (the June 1940 elections in Estonia, the 1921 Soviet invasion of Georgia) to underscore the gravity of the situation. The broader security context is emphasized to justify the importance of adopting the statement.