By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The rhetorical style is twofold: initially, it is analytical and poses logical questions, highlighting the confusion generated by the provisions. Subsequently, the speaker employs an anecdotal example (a rooster in the Pärnu Nature House) and humor to illustrate the potential absurdity of the law's limits and test its applicability in real life, concluding with a smile and a question.

The style is formal, serious, and concerned, focusing on clarifying the situation and obtaining assurances from the Prime Minister. Rhetorical questions are used ("what is happening in our dear Estonia?") to emphasize the concerns of the public and the media. The appeal is primarily logical and procedural, stressing the need to avoid any suspicion of bias in the administration of justice.