By Plenary Sessions: Eero Merilind

Direct criticism of opponents is absent, but the speaker addresses counterarguments raised by pensioners' associations and local governments concerning the continuation of subsidy payments. In the plenary session, critical questions are often met with a standard response—that the topic (for example, abandoning pension pillars) was not discussed in the committee—thereby shifting responsibility to other decision-makers.

The primary opposition is directed at the bill's presenter, whose grasp of the reasons for performing abortions and the definition of free will is deemed inaccurate. The criticism is conceptual and policy-driven, casting doubt on the depth of the presenter's analysis.