By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The political position focuses on the specifics of the renewable energy and nature conservation bill, raising questions regarding the inconsistency of the law's provisions. The speaker offers moderate criticism of the disparities concerning the differing treatment of the animal kingdom and the plant kingdom during the implementation of compensation and mitigation measures. This position is clearly policy-driven, concentrating on the substantive and biological logic underpinning the draft legislation.

The political stance focuses strongly on the procedural correctness and transparency of the legislative process. The speaker raises concern over conceptual changes being introduced under the guise of simple amendments, emphasizing the necessity of a formal preparatory intent (or drafting mandate). This position is policy- and value-based, stressing the substantive integrity of laws, particularly in the case of bills concerning climate and the environment.