By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

The rhetorical style is explanatory, serious, and empathetic, focusing on logical argumentation and dispelling common fears. The speaker employs both emotional appeal (referencing patients in hopeless conditions and their relatives) and legal precision, clearly distinguishing the declaration of intent from euthanasia. The tone is formal and aimed at finding consensus on a sensitive topic.

The style is supportive and argumentative, utilizing personal experience (research conducted in prison) to establish credibility. The speaker employs logical appeals to defend the minister's reforms and demonstrate that inmates' health problems are manageable. The tone is optimistic regarding the necessity of the reforms, yet moderately combative toward criticism from the opposition.

The rhetorical style is direct, critical, and demanding, focusing on the requirement for logical accountability. The speaker employs repetition and rephrasing to highlight the persistence of the issue, posing pointed questions regarding specific actions ("What have you done?"). The tone is formal, addressing the presiding officer and the presenter with respect.

The rhetorical style is polite, yet demanding and analytical, focusing on requesting specific knowledge and evidence. The tone is direct and logical, avoiding emotional appeals, and includes a brief, confident note regarding voice volume ("I can speak loudly"). The speaker asks the presenter to shed light on the topic, indicating a desire for a fact-based explanation.