By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

Not enough data.

Economic perspectives are strongly opposed to slapping on a new tax burden, especially when it affects large families and rural residents. The tax is viewed primarily as a mechanism for balancing the budget, rather than a driver of economic growth or environmental sustainability. Concerns have been raised regarding the planned substantial reform of funding for large families and the reduction of associated benefits.

Economic perspectives center on fiscal continuity, particularly concerning the delayed cancellation of the 'tax hump' and its resulting effect on teacher salary increases. Furthermore, concern is voiced over the potential dismantling of the funding principles of the Cultural Endowment of Estonia (Kultuurkapital), citing a previous statement made by the candidate for Minister of Finance.