Session Profile: Arvo Aller

The central theme revolves around the chronic underfunding of veterinary education—a shortfall of 2 million euros—and the direct link this has to both Estonian food security and national security. The speaker strongly advocates for the viability of rural life and the agricultural sector, contrasting this stance with the government's alleged "green frenzy" and its reliance on management driven solely by Excel spreadsheets. This position is deeply value-based, stressing the importance of self-sufficiency levels and the strategic necessity of preserving rural regions. On a political note, there is sharp criticism directed at a ruling party member's assertion that living in the countryside is environmentally harmful.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of agriculture, veterinary science, and food security, backing it up with specific data and statistics. Exact funding figures are cited (a deficit of 2 million, a subsidy ranging from 300,000 to 400,000 euros), along with references to earlier state investments (2004–2008). Detailed figures are also presented concerning Estonia's self-sufficiency levels across various food groups, as well as the usage of plant protection products and fertilizers compared to the EU average.

The tone is pressing and critical, especially regarding the government's inaction, referring to the insufficient funds as "candy money" and governance as being conducted "based on an Excel spreadsheet." The speaker employs both logical arguments (security, accreditation requirements) and emotional appeals, criticizing the youth's tendency to become "influencers" and the notion that food simply comes from the store. The style is formal, but incorporates personal recollections and references (a former deskmate, experience from their time as a minister).

All speeches were delivered during a single plenary session as part of the debate on an issue of significant national importance, demonstrating active engagement with the topic at hand. The speaker posed both brief clarifying questions to the rapporteurs and delivered a comprehensive concluding address, suggesting a systemic approach. Previous proposals (such as the reduction of VAT) and experience gained while serving as a minister were also mentioned.

The main targets of criticism are the government (which cannot secure additional funding) and the Ministry of Education and Research, which shows no interest in veterinary studies. The criticism is policy- and procedure-driven, accusing the government of "green hysteria" and managing the country based on an Excel spreadsheet, thereby ignoring the sector's needs. Separate opposition is directed at the stance of a ruling party member who considers living in the countryside detrimental to the environment.

The speaker expresses appreciation to the Rural Affairs Committee and to those who introduced this topic to the floor, as well as to the sector-specific organizations (the Chamber of Veterinarians, the Chamber of Agriculture and Commerce, and the University of Life Sciences). The continuing education solution developed by the Estonian University of Life Sciences using its own resources is particularly commended, as it helps former veterinarians return to the sector. This cooperation is focused on finding solutions together with the sector and with politicians who grasp the issue.

The focus is heavily on rural life, agriculture, and dispersed settlement, emphasizing the significance of rural areas for food security and national defense. Specific attention is paid to the Estonian University of Life Sciences and the investment needs of its academic buildings and experimental bases (Kreutzwaldi 62, Märja). It is stressed that Estonia is sufficiently sparsely populated that rural farmers should be considered part of national defense.

The speaker supports state intervention and securing additional funding for veterinary training, deeming it crucial for national security. There have been previous proposals to reduce the VAT on foodstuffs (including vegetables) to improve consumer affordability and bolster the production sector. The government’s current approach is being criticized for prioritizing fiscal discipline and the bottom line in an Excel spreadsheet over the actual viability of the sector.

The focus is on the quality of education and the pipeline of specialists, particularly in the field of veterinary medicine. Concern has been raised regarding the educational choices of young people, many of whom prefer to train as "influencers" and have lost touch with the realities of food production. The question of rural living is tied to both environmental impact and Estonian national security.

The primary priority is securing additional funding for veterinary education and ensuring its compliance with the 2025 accreditation requirements. The speaker has supported proposals to lower the VAT on foodstuffs in order to enhance food security. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on the need to review the availability of agricultural advisory services and the demand for specialists listed by the Rural Knowledge Centre.