Agenda Profile: Arvo Aller
Interpellation concerning the consequences of reducing family benefits (No. 561)
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is twofold: strong opposition to the organizational deficiencies and procedural delays of the Riigikogu Bureau, and clear support for family benefits. It is emphasized that financial value and support are centrally important in ensuring a family's sense of security, contrasting with the view that security depends only on one half of the family unit. The framing is motivated both procedurally (the work of the Bureau) and value-based (raising children is hard work).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the Riigikogu's procedures, particularly concerning the handling of interpellations and the requirements for verifying the physical presence of rapporteurs. The socio-political discussion addresses the context surrounding median wage figures and emphasizes the value of raising children as difficult labor. Furthermore, the speaker is aware of the respondent's rhetorical flaws (answering a question with a question).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and straightforward, particularly when highlighting procedural deficiencies, employing the phrase "don't point fingers." Both logical argumentation (the respondent's lack of knowledge) and emotional appeal are utilized (valuing child-rearing as difficult work that must not be ridiculed). The tone is demanding and inquisitive, especially regarding the plan for ensuring confidence.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in Riigikogu sessions, participating in debates on interpellations and criticizing the planning of the agenda. Earlier interpellations, dating back to June of last year, are mentioned, which indicates consistent activity in raising procedural matters.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at the Board of the Riigikogu, which is accused of procedural errors and insufficient diligence in verifying the presence of rapporteurs. Furthermore, the official responding to the interpellation is criticized for a lack of knowledge and for answering questions with further questions. There is also opposition to the viewpoint that pits working people against childcare providers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on state support and redistribution, highlighting the crucial role of family benefits. Raising children is viewed as difficult labor that justifies the payment of these allowances, thereby countering arguments often raised based on the median wage. These benefits are a vital component in guaranteeing a family's financial security.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is valuing the raising of children and ensuring the security of families through state support. The speaker strongly defends parents, emphasizing that raising children is difficult work that must not be ridiculed. Social policy must guarantee financial recognition and provide benefits aimed at creating a sense of security.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed towards improving the working procedures of the Riigikogu and holding the government accountable through interpellations. Essentially, the priority is the discussion of the consequences of reducing family benefits and clarifying the policy for ensuring a sense of security.
2 Speeches Analyzed