By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

The rhetorical style is critical and combative, employing harsh judgments such as "bungling economic policy" and "good stewardship" ironically. The speaker relies on logical arguments (the waste of IT spending, the deterioration of living standards) but emotionally stresses the suffering and difficulties faced by the public. The style is formal, aimed both at colleagues and those following the proceedings online.

The rhetorical style is direct, demanding, and critical, emphasizing the precise formulation of the question and requiring prepared answers from the minister. Both logical arguments (such as the negative impact of the healthcare budget) and emotional appeals (the helplessness of the population and the forced reliance on quick loans) are used to underscore the gravity of the situation.

The language used is confrontational and accusatory, addressing the minister directly and personally. Strong emotional appeals and rhetorical questions are employed to emphasize the minister's responsibility to the local community. The style is direct, and the goal is to discredit the opponent's explanations.

The style is urgent, emotional, and critical, emphasizing moral responsibility and the dignity of the elderly. Both detailed statistical data (a logical appeal) and emotional contrasting (the Estonian elderly person versus the European pensioner) are employed to underscore the seriousness of the situation. The speaker uses sharp expressions such as "chaos" and "green bureaucracy" and criticizes the government's actions.