Agenda Profile: Lauri Laats

The focus is on restoring the decision-making authority of local self-governments in setting land tax rates and presenting a critical assessment of the central government's current practices. They have expressed that a uniform tax rate without the possibility of differentiation may harm the sustainable management of local specificities and living standards, and they advocate for differentiating the land tax for agricultural and natural uses. Highlighting the impact of regional differences and restrictions on administrative rights, they have pointed out that legislative amendments must be considered to restore and expand the decision-making power of local authorities. The probable goal is to reform tax policy within the framework of government legislation, emphasizing the practical impact on the population and the financial viability of local governments.

Possesses knowledge regarding the amendments to the Land Tax Act and the Land Board's 2022 valuations; references specific changes in tax provisions and potential consequences (e.g., the elimination of the distinction between arable land and grasslands, a uniform tax rate). Employs terminology such as "amendments to the Land Tax Act," "significant disparities in tax rates," and "regular land valuation," indicating technical expertise and attention to legislative details.

The speaker uses a formal-parliamentary and fact-based approach, emphasizing the context of the interpellation and specific legislative points. In the first speech, the rhetoric primarily focuses on facts, questions, and accusations; the phrase “Thank you” and direct questions are used—the style is analytical and critical. In the second speech, the wording is kinder, expressing a desire for cooperation and appreciation, which creates a dialogical and milder tone.

A notable reference was made to the submission of legislative questions in the Riigikogu: an interpellation was filed in May by seven members of the Centre Party, focusing on the issue of local government autonomy in setting tax rates. In the second address, readiness was expressed to consider the initiator's observations and continue the dialogue with the government, underscoring the ongoing focus on discussion and analysis.

The main critics are the central government and the draft legislation that increased the administrative burdens of land tax. Accusations include the restriction of central decision-making power and the concentration into a uniform rate, with concerns also raised regarding regional inequality. The first speech expresses strong opposition and the need to restore the right of local governments to set differentiated rates. The second speech presents a rather cooperative and pragmatic position, but maintains continued criticism regarding regional disparity.

This demonstrates a readiness for dialogue and cooperation with the government: in the first address, explanations and answers are requested from the minister, and in the second, gratitude and a desire to collaborate on continuing the discussions are expressed. The principle of cooperation is regularly emphasized, but critical discourse regarding necessary legislative amendments also persists simultaneously.

Emphasis at the regional level: focuses on the limitations of local government taxation rights and the regional disparity between South and North Estonia. It is noted that the uniform application of tax rates could deepen regional disparities and affect the resources and economic activity of local governments.

A critical economic perspective on tax policy: the view that increasing land tax and implementing a uniform rate will place an additional burden on residents and fail to adequately address regional disparities. To stimulate the economy and preserve productivity, there is a call for differentiating tax rates between agricultural and non-agricultural land plots, alongside greater autonomy for local municipalities in decision-making.

The text emphasizes the residents' livelihood and standard of living: the problems being discussed are linked to the economic burden, and local financial resources and decision-making authority can significantly impact overall life and economic prosperity. Human well-being and financial stability at the local level constitute the primary social aspects.

The amendment of the Land Tax Act is highlighted as a priority: specifically, restoring and increasing the right of local governments to set separate tax rates for different types of land plots (agricultural land and natural grassland). Reference is made to the context of relevant bills and parliamentary inquiries, as well as the assessment of the impact of various drafts of the Land Tax Act; the objective is to enhance the financial autonomy of local municipalities.