By Years: Helmen Kütt

The style is predominantly formal, detailed, and persistent, especially when presenting the committee's work in her capacity as rapporteur. She employs strong emotional appeals when discussing the suffering of vulnerable groups (e.g., the Pihlakodu case, the poverty trap), and is repeatedly critical and demanding of ministers, particularly concerning SKAIS funding and the subsistence level. She often poses questions based on recurring concerns and appeals from interest groups, stressing the need for analysis and a long-term plan.

The register is formal and respectful ("Esteemed Chairman! Respected Minister!"), but the tone is often passionate and concerned, especially when social problems are being highlighted. It employs a balanced approach, utilizing both logical arguments (references to studies, statistics, explanatory memoranda) and emotional appeals (human dignity, real-life examples involving placenta bags). In the committee reports, the style is highly detailed and constructive.