By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and questioning, beginning with congratulations and well wishes for the Supreme Court nominee. The address is logical and focuses on the system's deficiencies, which have been complained about by numerous individuals, utilizing requests for a personal assessment.

The style is formal and respectful ("Esteemed Chairman! Respected Prime Minister!"), but it includes sharp procedural criticism regarding the Prime Minister's delay. The speech is logical and centers on a specific legislative issue—the failure to cover social costs within the context of a tax reduction. Emotional appeals are avoided; the focus remains strictly on facts and questions.

The speaking style is formal and detailed when introducing draft legislation, but shifts to become emotional and defensive when addressing social injustices, directly referencing how people are offended and hurt. The speaker appeals to the experiences of frontline workers (referred to as 'angel workers'). In procedural matters, the speaker is sharp and demands intervention from the session chair if they feel they are being labeled or lectured.

The rhetorical style is critical and forceful, especially when contrasting the negligible increase in social benefits with the high cost of the tax break for high earners. The speaker employs formal language (addressing the Prime Minister and the Presiding Officer) and relies heavily on logical arguments and specific financial figures.

The rhetorical style is interrogative, concerned, and critical, conveying confusion regarding the chronology of the government's actions ("it is getting progressively more confusing in that sense as it goes"). Powerful rhetorical questions are employed to highlight procedural illogicality and a lack of foresight. The tone is formal and focuses on logical and procedural appeals.

The tone is passionate and concerned, yet attempts to remain measured and explanatory, relying on figures and facts. It expresses deep disappointment and a sense of lost hope regarding the failure of the opposition's proposed legislation, but stresses that dialogue and explanation must continue nonetheless. Emotional appeals are used, highlighting the difficult circumstances faced by single parents, the elderly, and informal caregivers, in order to underscore the critical nature of these topics.