By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker intervenes to correct factual errors or assumptions that arose during the preceding discussion. The criticism is aimed at inaccurate information regarding mandatory military service, not at the individuals themselves.

The main criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of Defence, who have failed to adjust the benefit rates over the course of eight years. The criticism is procedural and structural, blaming the emergence of the problem on the diffusion of responsibility, which resulted from removing the personnel management sector from the purview of the Defence Forces.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government's policies, specifically regarding the raising of immigration quotas and the promotion of English-language higher education. The criticism is policy-driven, emphasizing the failure of integration and the lack of rational thought in political choices.