By Years: Urmas Kruuse

Direct criticism is aimed at Russia’s aggression, emphasizing that only sheer force (both military and economic) can counter it. He indirectly criticizes the viability of the opposition’s draft legislation, specifically casting doubt on the bill for taxing banks (by comparing banks to casinos). Furthermore, he expresses concern regarding the forces opposing Rail Baltic, labeling their actions a “total mistake.”

Criticism is directed at populist or emotional political initiatives, such as the bill proposing a 50% tax on bank profits, which he considers economically illogical and a bad signal to investors. He also criticizes claims that question the reliability of e-elections, citing freedom of choice. The speaker sharply criticizes the tone of the abortion debate, calling the labeling of women as murderers unacceptable.