By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the main opposing standpoints in the climate debate (necessity versus excessive cost) and employs economic terminology (cost, price, undervaluation). Specific emphasis is placed on the speed of knowledge acquisition and its link to political pressurization, pointing to the paradox existing between science and politics.

The expertise clearly lies in the field of rural affairs and environmental legislation, addressing specific topics such as plant propagation, variety protection, and forest law. The speaker has a precise command of parliamentary procedural language and the details of committee work, referencing the bill number and the stages of readings.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of public health statistics (specifically the dynamics of abortions) and the broader context of healthcare services, referencing a statistical downward trend. Furthermore, knowledge regarding the mechanisms of state funding for legal aid services is employed in the argumentation to draw comparisons intended to challenge the opposing side's logic.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding agricultural policy and EU subsidies, citing specific statistics (Estonia receives 84% of the European average). He uses technical terminology, such as "agricultural subsidies based on enterprise competitiveness," and references the role of prime ministers in determining the proportions.