By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The style is formal, analytical, and highly detailed, relying on logical arguments and concrete policy examples. The tone is critical yet constructive, highlighting shortcomings (such as the slow progress in public procurement and the decline in the quality of school meals) and offering systemic solutions. The speaker also poses a technical question, expressing doubt about the statistical effectiveness of reducing the VAT on foodstuffs. Finally, the speaker references their previous ministerial experience.

The speaker’s style is formal, respectful, and analytical, beginning with thanks for the presentation and addressing the esteemed session chair. The questions are posed logically and structured, dividing the topic into two clear parts. A rhetorical question is used to emphasize the danger of conflict between freedoms and children’s rights, balancing the logical argumentation with social concern.

The rhetorical style is extremely formal and neutral, focusing on the presentation of facts and the chronological description of the procedural course. The speech is logical and detailed, avoiding emotional appeals or personal judgments, and is directed at the members of the Riigikogu and the public.

The style is inquisitive, analytical, and fact-based, focusing on verifying the presenter's claims and clarifying the data. The speaker employs logical appeals to draw attention to the system's actual functioning and improve public discourse, while avoiding emotional expressions.