By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The rhetorical style is predominantly formal and procedural, especially in the commission's report, where facts, dates, and consensus are emphasized. When the question is posed, the tone is critical and concerned, utilizing logical appeals and rhetorical questions to highlight the issue of privacy violation and injustice.

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on logical arguments and comparisons. The speaker poses direct questions to the presenter, seeking clarification regarding the implications of economic trends and the future outlook. The tone is formal and respectful ("Esteemed Chairman! Highly respected Presenter!").

The rhetorical style is confident and direct, employing strong condemnations to denounce the actions of opponents ("a total error"). The speaker presents logical arguments concerning the strategic necessity and concludes with an optimistic vision of future trade acceleration between Tallinn and Helsinki. The tone is formal, addressing the session chairman and the minister respectfully.