By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The speaker contrasts with the presenter, defending previous government subsidies to entrepreneurs and questioning the necessity of a moratorium on the climate law. Furthermore, the presenter’s asserted link between emotional insecurity and high employment is challenged. The criticism is aimed at the political standpoints and the quality of the analysis.

The primary criticism is aimed at the geopolitical stances of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, especially regarding his proposal to turn Ukraine into a buffer zone. The criticism is intense and politically charged, stressing that such statements contain "quite a few insidious elements and dangerous tendencies."

The criticism is directed at claims voiced in the chamber suggesting a seemingly straightforward change that supposedly doesn't require a legislative amendment, emphasizing that this is legally incorrect. Furthermore, the opposing side's references to the success of regulations in certain countries (Hungary, Italy) are refuted, as it is noted that these do not accurately reflect the truth. The opposition is strictly procedural and policy-based.

Not enough data.