By Months: Eerik-Niiles Kross

The opposition's criticism is primarily aimed at the legal clarity of the draft bill and the retention of voting rights for holders of the alien's passport (grey passport), which they deem inconsistent. The speaker rejects arguments that directly associate the removal of voting rights with supporting Putin or "ideological screening," stressing instead that the measure concerns the streamlining of the legal framework and the mitigation of security risks.

The criticism is directed against the independent and uncontrolled activity of the system or device (the control panel/remote), and not against specific political opponents or groups. Insufficient information regarding the criticism of the political opposition.

The primary adversaries are Russia (Putin's regime, considered illegitimate) and the Georgian government (Ivanishvili's group), both of whom are accused of dismantling democracy and gravitating toward Moscow. It also criticizes Western countries for their previous complacency and diplomatic failure (the 2009 "reset" with Russia).

The main institutional criticism is directed against the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, which is accused of inciting aggression and propagating a more radical version of the *Russkiy Mir* ideology. The Kremlin is also criticized for adopting this ideology, with critics noting that the relationship constitutes mutual exploitation. The criticism is ideological and political-institutional.

The primary and sole adversary is the Russian Federation, which is being sharply and legally justifiably criticized for systematic war crimes, the abduction of children, and the ongoing violation of international law. The criticism is directed both at the Russian state and at specific individuals, such as Maria Lvova-Belova and Vladimir Putin, and the confrontation is intense and uncompromising.