Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
2025-05-21
Political Position
For me, the conflict between the car tax and the Constitution is the central issue. I support the Center Party’s stance that the car tax increases the overall tax burden and is therefore unconstitutional; I demand either amendments or the complete repeal of the car tax. Although the Riigikogu supported this position, no actual change has been implemented, highlighting the need for further action. I am prepared to use all legal remedies available, including appealing to the Supreme Court, and I am awaiting a new or revised draft bill from the Ministry of Finance.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
It demonstrates clear legal standing, utilizes arguments concerning constitutionality, and provides examples of appeals to the administrative court. It refers to the assessment provided by the Chancellor of Justice and the potential review by the Supreme Court. It clarifies that core values – specifically the interests of children and families with special needs – are crucial within tax policy.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
A critical, fact-based speech that incorporates both questions and examples. It stresses the utilization of legal remedies and adherence to constitutional principles. The tone is resolutely critical, yet non-hostile. The speech is formal, rich with factual evidence, and solution-oriented.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main focus is on the opposition to the car tax; the car tax's conflict with the constitution is highlighted, and additional criticism centers on the reasons for its implementation. This stance relies on the positions presented to the Chancellor of Justice and the Riigikogu (Parliament), emphasizing the necessity for amendments or outright repeal.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It involves the actions of the Centre Party and parliamentary cooperation: it points out that the Centre Party has already filed complaints with the administrative court, and the Riigikogu has supported the position. It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate at the level of the Riigikogu and ministries in order to achieve an amendment or a repeal.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A key concern is the situation of low-income families and those in rural areas: it is noted that large families, families with special needs, and families living in rural areas are facing increasingly difficult circumstances due to the car tax.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It emphasizes the increase in the tax burden (33% vs 36%) and pressure from the IMF; the focus is on the negative economic impact on families and the unfavorable distribution. It highlights that the car tax is inconsistent with reasonable economic and social objectives and requires reconsideration or abolition.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on families and social impacts: large families, people with disabilities, and families living in rural areas will be forced to give up their cars due to the vehicle tax, which impacts workforce participation, access to schooling, and overall quality of life. This stance is advocated for in the interest of establishing a safer and more equitable social arrangement.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary objective is either amending or abolishing the car tax; it notes that the Center Party has filed two appeals with the administrative court and the Riigikogu has supported the constitutional position, but actual progress has been slow. The aim is for the Ministry of Finance to draft a new or revised bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed