Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
2025-04-15
Political Position
The speech emphasizes the accountability of the legal system and the protection of victims; it expresses strong criticism regarding the actions of the Prosecutor's Office and demands explanations and potential steps to initiate criminal proceedings against associated legal entities. The aforementioned lack of victim protection is cited as a problem that needs to be remedied. There is insufficient data to define broader partisan or ideological trends.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge regarding the commencement of criminal proceedings and law enforcement practices, specifically within the context of observations concerning the initiation of proceedings against a legal entity. Cites expert opinions and legal terminology (criminal procedure, inconsistent regulation of offenses, victim protection).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
A tone focused on questions and clarifications, directly critical and demanding. It utilizes comparisons and references to previous incidents, which provides a justification for raising specific topics and highlighting the necessity of fulfilling prior commitments. A formal and discursive presentation style.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She speaks at the plenary session (15.04.2025) and refers to committee discussions (the Special Committee Against Corruption). This final reference is beneficial, as it demonstrates regular participation and a readiness to cite previous discussions and events.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
A critical stance towards the Prosecutor's Office and the justice system, as well as the broader informant network (due to unacceptable public statements and the lack of protection for victims). The second speech features sharp criticism against lobbying and the associated idealistic posturing and political games (Uber, Bolt, the Reform Party, Eesti 200); delivered with a strong opposition tone. The intensity is high.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is at the national level; reference is made to European Union directives and issues applicable nationwide (ride-sharing regulations, safety, and labor rights). There appears to be no central regional (or local) focus.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports regulation and consumer protection (e.g., requiring traffic insurance for scooters) and highlights the need to establish and ensure additional social guarantees for the ride-sharing workforce. At the same time, it criticizes the lobbying efforts of certain interest groups that contradict social or market principles. It does not directly address detailed positions on taxation or the general large financial structure.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Strengthening the protection of victims and the rights of rape victims; it emphasizes the legal system's protection and accountability. Furthermore, it mentions additional social guarantees for workers in the ride-sharing sector, highlighting the issues of employment relationships and social security.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary objective is to establish modern regulations for ride-sharing services and mitigate associated risks (e.g., mandatory liability insurance for scooters). Objections regarding the undermining (torpedoing) of the European Union directive are mentioned, and the necessity of ensuring additional social guarantees and labor rights is stressed. Less focus is placed on the specific details of drafting the bills, but there is a clear emphasis on increasing regulations, enhancing safety, and ensuring EU legislative oversight.
2 Speeches Analyzed