Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
2024-04-15
Political Position
He/She reviews the draft bill critically: the primary motive is revenue generation, not the improvement of traffic behavior. (The party) demands coordination with the ministry and an impact assessment to evaluate the reduction in misdemeanors and traffic violations. The position is characterized by moderate to strong opposition and is process-centric.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Refers to the explanatory memorandum and the background of the draft, demonstrating knowledge of the budgetary process and implementation; it emphasizes that an impact assessment is necessary before proceeding.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is professional, critical, and inquisitive; it uses specific references to documents and poses questions designed to uncover deficiencies.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Mentions that a discussion will take place tomorrow in the Legal Affairs Committee; this demonstrates regular parliamentary oversight and active participation in controlling the process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Critical of the draft bill; highlights the lack of an impact assessment and the need for coordination; does not support the current form.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Emphasizes cooperation with the Ministry and the necessity of coordination; demonstrates willingness for dialogue and partnership.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It emphasizes that the bill’s rationale is budget implementation and a fiscal objective; it criticizes that the impact is non-existent or has been insufficiently addressed recently; it demands an impact assessment that would evaluate the effect on the economy and public safety.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Is committed to improving traffic safety and seeks a reduction in the number of misdemeanors and traffic violations, but emphasizes the need for an impact analysis before resorting to judicial measures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The key priorities are the absence of an impact assessment and the need for cooperation with the ministry. It is emphasized that the discussion should be held in the Legal Affairs Committee, and the substance of the draft legislation requires thorough evaluation before proceeding.
1 Speeches Analyzed