Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to reduce the VAT on foodstuffs to 9 percent" (579 OE)
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The core stance involves criticizing the Social Democrats' tax policy and defending the national economy and citizens' ability to cope. He stresses that the measures being pushed—such as raising the car tax and VAT, and implementing taxation from the first euro—are detrimental to the populace and are being slammed as "anti-people" decisions. There is no significant desire apparent to broadly cut taxes or spending in related areas; the position remains more critical than offering a concrete alternative plan. The framing is policy- and value-driven, highlighting public welfare and the state's economic consciousness.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
It demonstrates technical knowledge of tax policy: specific figures are mentioned (VAT 24%, income tax 24%) and there is discussion about the scope of taxation (starting from the very first euro). It highlights the cost of the shopping basket and the impact of taxes on consumption, thereby showing economic awareness regarding tax policy. It uses examples and assesses how tax measures affect the livelihood of specific groups.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The language is characterized by a combative or aggressive undertone, utilizing accusatory and highly emotional framing. It employs rhetorical questions and direct personal attacks (e.g., "hypocrisy," "inhumane government"). While the text is powerful in the context of ad hominem arguments and political warfare, it does contain some factual references.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Three speeches on the same day (17.04.2025) and references to the broader context of discussions among colleagues and in parliament (Laar Laats' comment, Jürgen Ligi's response). Regular participation in debates and the processing of parliamentary matters and draft legislation signals active and consistent parliamentary practice.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
A distinctly oppositional stance regarding the social democrats' tax policy: criticism leveled at their tax policy, which is characterized as detrimental to the public. Intense criticism, featuring personal accusations ("anti-people government," "hypocrisy"). There is a noticeable lack of constructive substance; the focus is on resistance and the demonization of opponents' policies.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is insufficient data regarding cooperation or compromise with different political parties; the discussions primarily feature criticism and a confrontational tone. Some references to colleagues and freedom of speech can be observed, but no positive examples of collaborative efforts are presented.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is no indication of regional focus; attention is centered on national tax and legislative bills and the general economic context.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic policy centers on criticizing tax hikes and the cost of the consumer basket, stressing the importance of people’s livelihoods and maintaining balance in the nation’s economic development. He/She emphasizes the need to avoid harmful tax multipliers and views the stabilization of the state’s economic activity as a crucial objective. There is strong opposition to raising VAT and income tax; the focus remains firmly on sound fiscal decisions and protecting the living standards of the population.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The text highlights the social impact on people's ability to cope and the plight of pensioners. It criticizes tax policies that increase residents' costs (e.g., via taxation) and, consequently, focuses attention on vulnerable groups and living standards. On matters relating to social justice and lifestyle, the tone is critical and expresses concern.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary objective is the discussion of Bill 579 OE during its first reading, and, specifically concerning the bill to reduce VAT on foodstuffs, highlighting the political position. It is stressed that the opposition has either been slow to act or actively opposed, and that the pervasive political consequences of these bills must be weighed within the framework of the parliamentary process.
3 Speeches Analyzed