Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"
2025-11-10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political position focuses heavily on the trustworthiness and procedural integrity of e-elections. The speaker urgently calls for the suspension of e-voting until all identified issues, such as the lack of opportunity for political parties to appoint auditors, have been resolved by the legislature. This stance is motivated by the necessity of ensuring the legality and security of the elections, underscoring the responsibility of the legislature.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the procedural and legislative issues surrounding e-elections. He specifically references a public hearing, the testimonies provided by the Chairman of the Electoral Commission, and the conclusions drawn in the OSCE ODIHR report. Specific terminology, such as "auditors" and the "Constitutional Committee," is employed, underscoring the necessity for legislative amendments.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, yet urgent and critical, utilizing questions directed at the committee chairman to underscore accountability. The speaker relies on logical arguments and references to previous testimonies (OSCE, the Electoral Commission) to highlight the pressing need to resolve the issue. Rhetorical questions are employed to challenge the sensibility of the Riigikogu's inaction.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker has actively participated in public discussions and sessions concerning e-elections, referencing a "very large public hearing." The current appearance is connected to the continuation of the first reading of the Riigikogu bill, which demonstrates active involvement in the legislative process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the legislature, which has so far failed to resolve the issues surrounding e-voting, despite recommendations from the Election Commission and OSCE/ODIHR. The objection is procedural and centers on the continuation of e-voting before these deficiencies are rectified.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker addresses the committee chairman respectfully, but their goal is to challenge the Constitutional Committee's current position regarding the preparation of the draft bill. They use arguments based on knowledge gained through cooperation, referencing the testimony provided by the Electoral Commission and international organizations (OSCE).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislative processes and the organization of elections, specifically referencing the Riigikogu elections. There is also an important international focus, given that the OSCE ODIHR report is cited.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient Data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on Bill 679 OE, which addresses the suspension of e-voting. The speaker, who is both an initiator and supporter of these reforms, is demanding that the legislature implement specific amendments before the elections can proceed. The objective is to ensure the legislature implements all necessary changes before the next Riigikogu elections.
1 Speeches Analyzed