Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Draft law amending the Sports Act (518 SE) - first reading
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
I support increasing the safety of motorsports competitions and clarifying the requirements through federation certifications; this is a primary priority for me because safety is crucial. However, there is a critical concern that the federation might use this certification system for self-gain or to exert competitive pressure on event organizers; I demand transparent and controlled implementation. This is not an ideological or radical attempt at a complete overhaul, but rather a proactive and practical approach to solving the issue.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the draft bill's provisions: the mandatory permit application to the rural municipality/local government and the requirement for federation approvals, as well as the need to ensure that competitions are planned in accordance with the federation's requirements; refers to ensuring safety in sports and liability. Primarily raises structural and regulatory questions, and expresses concern related to risks that may arise from the granting of these approvals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone reflects local concern, polite and inquisitive; it employs an argumentative, fact-based approach and emphasizes the importance of safety. Using a measured, calm, and elevated tone, it poses questions, seeking assurance and clarification rather than attacking the responses.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Sustained activity across the day's discussions, centered on a specific draft bill and its practical implications. Clearly raises questions regarding safety and implementation, and seeks guidance on the issuance of necessary approvals, indicating a willingness to continue the debate.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
I am not asserting direct opposition to the draft legislation; the criticism focuses mainly on procedural and economic risks (specifically, the potential cost and expiration of necessary certifications), rather than the bill's overall objective. I support the improvement of security but stress the necessity of oversight and transparency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates readiness for dialogue: mentions the involvement of local governments and the federation, and the need to discuss the concerns of small track owners. It seeks open consultations and clarifications to avoid potential speculative revenue or delays.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is no specific regional focus; it refers to the local governments of rural municipalities and cities as stakeholders and addresses the issue within the context of a national bill. Regions are mentioned for contextual purposes, not as a central priority.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Facing economic risks: expressing concern over potential additional costs and unreasonable fees, and the resulting burden this places on competitors and organizers. It seeks to ensure that issuing approvals does not create undue financial pressure or unfair advantages.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Safety and responsibility are highlighted as core values in sports; it emphasizes the necessity for clarity and efficiency in the mechanisms related to improving safety. Ensuring security is a primary social priority.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main objective is the strengthening of the provisions for organizing motorsport competitions and the clarification and harmonization of the regulation concerning federation approvals. It supports the first reading of the draft bill and emphasizes the practical execution and oversight of the implementation, requesting clarifications and guarantees from the Minister to prevent delays and additional costs.
2 Speeches Analyzed