Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Political Position: The position opposes the government’s plan to alter the role of the Secretary of State and introduce the fast-track bill, arguing that these actions could undermine the foundations of the rule of law and exacerbate public distrust in state institutions. It stresses that the rule of law must be safeguarded, and the consistency of legislation must align with the constitution and established practices, rather than being driven by the interests of a single individual. This stance is strongly critical, aiming to limit the potential for corruption risks through adherence to legitimate and transparent procedures.

Subject Matter Expertise: The speaker clearly articulates the State Secretary's role in legislation and ensuring the compliance of the Constitution with other laws, emphasizing the necessity of legal education and the importance of independent professional standards. The text points to the Climate Law as an example where officials should critically evaluate the legislative approach, highlighting legal requirements and the quality of the legislative drafting process. It employs terminology such as "draft laws," "constitutional compliance," and "monitoring the State Secretary's duties."

Rhetorical style: combines a sharply critical and emotional tone, employing arguments substantiated by evidence and comparisons. It uses rhetorical questions and comparisons (e.g., Hungary) and expresses strong concern regarding the loss of trust. The tone is semi-formalized, yet rigidly accusatory and repeatedly stresses the technical background.

Patterns of Activity: presents several speeches on the same day (2025-01-15) in the context of the sitting of the Special Committee Against Corruption, referring to upcoming sittings and the desire for cooperation. Mentions previous events such as the summer coalition negotiations and a corruption survey, which provide the background for the political activity. Demonstrates a consistent, parliament-centric struggle and a frequent need to speak on issues related to the topic.

The Opposition's Stance: The speech delivers a strong response to the coalition’s actions, criticizing policies concerning the drafting of bills and the lack of inclusion. It criticizes the creation of a crisis of trust and the existing power structures, emphasizing that judicial cases must strictly follow the legislative process and maintain independence. The criticism is characterized as strong, uncompromising, and aimed at prioritizing the defense of the rule of law.

Style of cooperation: emphasizes the shared need to protect the rule of law, while simultaneously presenting strong criticism of the government's actions. It is suggested that opportunities for prior cooperation may have existed, but in practice, the core of their message focuses on themes of opposition and scrutiny. They also point out that adequate cooperation has not been achieved concerning the coalition's own draft legislation.

Regional focus: the state/national level; in the temporal context, specific regional examples concerning native languages are absent; the emphasis is on Estonian state institutions and legislation.

Economic Outlook: Data/references regarding economic policy are missing; therefore, Not enough data.

Social Issues: Social topics (abortion, LGBT, immigration, etc.) are missing from the coverage; therefore, Not enough data.

Legislative Focus: focuses on defining the role of the Secretary of State in legislation and ensuring independence; criticizes the rushed nature of the bill, and emphasizes the need for drafts to comply with the constitution and historical practice. It refers to the session of the special anti-corruption committee and the broader question of public trust in the legislative process.