By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The style is inquisitive and analytical, aimed at the minister or the presiding officer to elicit clarification. A rhetorical device ("the evil hand") is employed to challenge the opposing party's narrative, emphasizing the logical argument that the actual problem is the market price. The tone is formal and centers on clarifying specific political decisions.

The tone is businesslike, formal, and moderately optimistic, particularly regarding the outcomes of the legislative procedure, which he considers to have improved. He employs logical appeals, stressing the reasonableness of the law and the necessity of avoiding public resentment. He thanks his colleagues and refers to earlier speeches, while refraining from going into detail.

The rhetorical style is balanced, pragmatic, and solution-oriented, explaining the positive impact and improvements of the draft bill. The speaker uses both logical argumentation (money has to come from somewhere, fixing mistakes) and emotional appeals, expressing concern that in the case of unfair taxes, his "heart would have ached" and he would have felt "ashamed before his fellow citizens." He emphasizes that there is something good in every unpleasant thing.

The style is serious, rational, and analytical, emphasizing the need to approach policy decisions "with a cool head." It employs both logical arguments (the financial cost of damages, the direct correlation between price and harm) and emotional examples (how cheaply one can drink themselves into a blackout) to highlight the abnormal nature of the situation.